Outline a standard ethics decision-making model and how to apply it to a dilemma.

Outline a standard ethics decision-making model and how to apply it to a dilemma.

• A. Ignore codes and act on impulse.
• B. Identify a dilemma, review relevant codes, consider stakeholders, assess risks/benefits, generate options, choose action with justification, document, and seek supervision.
• C. Ask unrelated colleagues for advice without documentation.
• D. Post a decision on social media instead of taking action.

Answer: (B)

A structured ethics decision-making process is used to handle dilemmas in professional helping roles. It starts by identifying the dilemma and the ethical issues at stake, then grounding the next steps in relevant codes of ethics to ensure actions align with professional standards. Next, it considers all stakeholders—clients, families, colleagues, and the broader community—to understand duties, rights, and potential harms. A careful assessment of risks and benefits follows, weighing likely outcomes to avoid unintended consequences. Generating multiple options is important to avoid a rushed or impulsive choice, and the final action should be chosen with a clear justification that connects reasoning to values, codes, and projected impact. Documenting the entire process creates a transparent record for accountability and future reference. Finally, seeking supervision or consultation adds perspective and support when the situation is complex or ambiguous. Choosing actions without codes or professional guidance is risky because it bypasses established standards and can cause harm. Asking unrelated colleagues without documentation lacks ethical grounding and accountability. Sharing decisions on social media can breach confidentiality and professional duties.

A structured ethics decision-making process is used to handle dilemmas in professional helping roles. It starts by identifying the dilemma and the ethical issues at stake, then grounding the next steps in relevant codes of ethics to ensure actions align with professional standards. Next, it considers all stakeholders—clients, families, colleagues, and the broader community—to understand duties, rights, and potential harms. A careful assessment of risks and benefits follows, weighing likely outcomes to avoid unintended consequences. Generating multiple options is important to avoid a rushed or impulsive choice, and the final action should be chosen with a clear justification that connects reasoning to values, codes, and projected impact. Documenting the entire process creates a transparent record for accountability and future reference. Finally, seeking supervision or consultation adds perspective and support when the situation is complex or ambiguous.

Choosing actions without codes or professional guidance is risky because it bypasses established standards and can cause harm. Asking unrelated colleagues without documentation lacks ethical grounding and accountability. Sharing decisions on social media can breach confidentiality and professional duties.